<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Open Thread Thursday: Genealogy Bloggers and Source Citations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/</link>
	<description>The ultimate site for your genealogy blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 13:02:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Randy Seaver</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5590</link>
		<dc:creator>Randy Seaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5590</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a challenge to post my sources for each bit of information.  Thinking back on the variety of posts about actual research, I find that I:

*  Post a source for the material used for Amanuensis Monday.  It is usually in the text rather than an endnote.

*  Don&#039;t post a &quot;real&quot; source for the Tombstone Tuesday, Wordless Wednesday or Treasure Chest Thursday posts.  Most of the images are from my own collection and I don&#039;t bother.  Others do - good for them!

*  Don&#039;t post sources for info in Surname Saturday posts.  These posts are created from my database, and then edited down.  They often include 4 to 8 families with 2 to 15 children each.  Doing sources for them is not an option.  I&#039;ve been trying to add a general source - e.g., a surname book - if I have one.  Unfortunately, information on many of my ancestral families came from family history and town history books, not from original source records.  Readers can contact me for the sources if they want to.

*  Other posts about individuals or families are sometimes sourced, and sometimes not sourced, depending on the material I have and if I remember to do it!  

I am still working on adding sources to my database.  It is over 39,000 persons, and I had very few &quot;real&quot; sources when I started.  I have thousands now, but they are still in shorthand format.  

In principle, I agree that facts should be sourced.  In practice, and on a blog, it&#039;s difficult to do consistently.  Or maybe I&#039;m just too lazy?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a challenge to post my sources for each bit of information.  Thinking back on the variety of posts about actual research, I find that I:</p>
<p>*  Post a source for the material used for Amanuensis Monday.  It is usually in the text rather than an endnote.</p>
<p>*  Don&#8217;t post a &#8220;real&#8221; source for the Tombstone Tuesday, Wordless Wednesday or Treasure Chest Thursday posts.  Most of the images are from my own collection and I don&#8217;t bother.  Others do &#8211; good for them!</p>
<p>*  Don&#8217;t post sources for info in Surname Saturday posts.  These posts are created from my database, and then edited down.  They often include 4 to 8 families with 2 to 15 children each.  Doing sources for them is not an option.  I&#8217;ve been trying to add a general source &#8211; e.g., a surname book &#8211; if I have one.  Unfortunately, information on many of my ancestral families came from family history and town history books, not from original source records.  Readers can contact me for the sources if they want to.</p>
<p>*  Other posts about individuals or families are sometimes sourced, and sometimes not sourced, depending on the material I have and if I remember to do it!  </p>
<p>I am still working on adding sources to my database.  It is over 39,000 persons, and I had very few &#8220;real&#8221; sources when I started.  I have thousands now, but they are still in shorthand format.  </p>
<p>In principle, I agree that facts should be sourced.  In practice, and on a blog, it&#8217;s difficult to do consistently.  Or maybe I&#8217;m just too lazy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5589</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 16:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5589</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think this discussion is terrific and I believe it is a great example of genie blogs, genie research, genie data bases and family historians are all INDIVIDUALS with different obsessions, outlooks, goals, talent and time.  

I am the first to say and teach, YOU GOTTA SOURCE your data.  I stress to newbies that you must source EVERY single fact you input to your data base, bar NONE!  Do it , every single time.  I don&#039;t really care if your sources are techy correct, do what works for you.  The reality is, very few family researchers will ever publish a work or book, if you take the numbers that research and compare to the numbers that publish.  So, source for YOU, so you can remember where you found the information.  FOR YOU!

As far as this discussion, it just shows our individualism once again.  I just love it.  So many ways to approach our blogs.  If you are techy and academically inclined footnotes rule, go for it. If you are more into wanting your family to read a bit about their family and want to keep it light, go for it.

Individualism Rules!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this discussion is terrific and I believe it is a great example of genie blogs, genie research, genie data bases and family historians are all INDIVIDUALS with different obsessions, outlooks, goals, talent and time.  </p>
<p>I am the first to say and teach, YOU GOTTA SOURCE your data.  I stress to newbies that you must source EVERY single fact you input to your data base, bar NONE!  Do it , every single time.  I don&#8217;t really care if your sources are techy correct, do what works for you.  The reality is, very few family researchers will ever publish a work or book, if you take the numbers that research and compare to the numbers that publish.  So, source for YOU, so you can remember where you found the information.  FOR YOU!</p>
<p>As far as this discussion, it just shows our individualism once again.  I just love it.  So many ways to approach our blogs.  If you are techy and academically inclined footnotes rule, go for it. If you are more into wanting your family to read a bit about their family and want to keep it light, go for it.</p>
<p>Individualism Rules!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda McCauley</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5588</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda McCauley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:22:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree that sources are extremely important, actually critical but with that said, I don&#039;t usually include my sources (at least as footnotes) in blog posts. However, I think I have an acceptable alternative. I started my blog as a companion to my full blown family history website which does have sources documented. Most everyone I mention in a blog post is linked to their information on my website so my sources are available to anyone who is willing to make an extra click or two. I have a note in the blog sidebar that additional information (including sources) is available by clicking on the links. My hope is that this satisfies both the people who don&#039;t care about seeing the sources and the ones who do.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that sources are extremely important, actually critical but with that said, I don&#8217;t usually include my sources (at least as footnotes) in blog posts. However, I think I have an acceptable alternative. I started my blog as a companion to my full blown family history website which does have sources documented. Most everyone I mention in a blog post is linked to their information on my website so my sources are available to anyone who is willing to make an extra click or two. I have a note in the blog sidebar that additional information (including sources) is available by clicking on the links. My hope is that this satisfies both the people who don&#8217;t care about seeing the sources and the ones who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Theresa Casteel</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5587</link>
		<dc:creator>Theresa Casteel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 15:14:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[All genealogists should be able to provide sources to their research if requested; but in regards to blogs, I most agree with bullet 4:  • many bloggers – some of whom are professional genealogists and some with certification credentials – don’t treat their blog posts as academic research and again, prefer to provide source citations upon request.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All genealogists should be able to provide sources to their research if requested; but in regards to blogs, I most agree with bullet 4:  • many bloggers – some of whom are professional genealogists and some with certification credentials – don’t treat their blog posts as academic research and again, prefer to provide source citations upon request.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J.M.</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5586</link>
		<dc:creator>J.M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:34:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When looking at my own blog, I can see three types of posts. All three get a different treatment as to sourcing.

I have posts that are just showing what I am doing, what I am researching. These are about works-in-progress, and I don&#039;t source them, as it&#039;s usually just a &#039;I&#039;m doing this&#039; post.

I also have posts that fall in the &#039;look what I found!&#039; category. These normally are about a specific bit of information and the post itself details where I found it. No need to put in a source, as the source is in the post.

And then I have my &#039;showcase&#039; posts. COG posts, posts about local or world history and of course biographies of my ancestors. These posts are written in story-form and I put all of my sources at the end. Although I am thinking about switching to footnotes in future posts for this. Either way, all of the sources I used are in the post.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When looking at my own blog, I can see three types of posts. All three get a different treatment as to sourcing.</p>
<p>I have posts that are just showing what I am doing, what I am researching. These are about works-in-progress, and I don&#8217;t source them, as it&#8217;s usually just a &#8216;I&#8217;m doing this&#8217; post.</p>
<p>I also have posts that fall in the &#8216;look what I found!&#8217; category. These normally are about a specific bit of information and the post itself details where I found it. No need to put in a source, as the source is in the post.</p>
<p>And then I have my &#8216;showcase&#8217; posts. COG posts, posts about local or world history and of course biographies of my ancestors. These posts are written in story-form and I put all of my sources at the end. Although I am thinking about switching to footnotes in future posts for this. Either way, all of the sources I used are in the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: seekingsurnames</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5583</link>
		<dc:creator>seekingsurnames</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;u lookin at me? RT @geneabloggers: Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? http://su.pr/1kt7hj #genealogy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">u lookin at me? RT @geneabloggers: Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? <a href="http://su.pr/1kt7hj" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/1kt7hj</a> #genealogy</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy M.</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5585</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy M.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been blogging just over a year.  I included source citations in several of my earliest posts.  Though I looked at the sources to write the posts, it took a lot of time and effort and it didn&#039;t seem to be of interest to anyone.  And I noticed that of the blogs I read, no one else cited sources.  So I usually don&#039;t. 
I think it&#039;s very important to have, know, and consult sources when writing factual blog posts, but I think it depends on the purpose of the blogger whether he/she cites sources in posts.
Another thought I had is that if one can read your blog and get the sources for all your information, there&#039;s less reason for that person to email you.  No cited sources could encourage another researcher to contact you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been blogging just over a year.  I included source citations in several of my earliest posts.  Though I looked at the sources to write the posts, it took a lot of time and effort and it didn&#8217;t seem to be of interest to anyone.  And I noticed that of the blogs I read, no one else cited sources.  So I usually don&#8217;t.<br />
I think it&#8217;s very important to have, know, and consult sources when writing factual blog posts, but I think it depends on the purpose of the blogger whether he/she cites sources in posts.<br />
Another thought I had is that if one can read your blog and get the sources for all your information, there&#8217;s less reason for that person to email you.  No cited sources could encourage another researcher to contact you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: familytreegirl</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5576</link>
		<dc:creator>familytreegirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 04:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5576</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @LCAfricana: RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thurs - Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? http://su.pr/1kt7hj #genealogy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @LCAfricana: RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thurs &#8211; Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? <a href="http://su.pr/1kt7hj" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/1kt7hj</a> #genealogy</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherpal</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5577</link>
		<dc:creator>cherpal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thursday - Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? http://su.pr/1kt7hj #gen ...&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thursday &#8211; Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? <a href="http://su.pr/1kt7hj" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/1kt7hj</a> #gen &#8230;</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lcafricana</title>
		<link>http://geneabloggers.com/genealogy-bloggers-source-citations/#comment-5578</link>
		<dc:creator>lcafricana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 03:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.geneabloggers.com/?p=8162#comment-5578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_comment&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_twitter_username&quot;&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;topsy_trackback_content&quot;&gt;RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thurs - Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? http://su.pr/1kt7hj #genealogy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span class="topsy_trackback_comment"><span class="topsy_twitter_username"><span class="topsy_trackback_content">RT @geneabloggers: Open Thread Thurs &#8211; Should genealogy bloggers set a better example with Source Citations? <a href="http://su.pr/1kt7hj" rel="nofollow">http://su.pr/1kt7hj</a> #genealogy</span></span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
